Search for: "Doe v. State"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 93,909
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2011, 6:39 am
”] United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
State,272 Ga. 540 (1) (533 SE2d 60) (2000); State of Ga. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 3:04 pm
Related posts:Obscure Patents: KSR Does Not Mean MuchSo much has been made about the United States Supreme Court's decision in KSR v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:14 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 10:42 am
Perry v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
The court concluded that the statute does not violate either state or federal due process protections. [read post]
22 May 2007, 11:10 am
Another invitation brief is in, and it looks like the Court may have another case for its OT2007 line-up: the United States (in a brief available here) recommended that cert. be granted in No. 06-856, LaRue v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:11 pm
(referring to Kahn v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 4:42 pm
On 15 August 2023 Collins Rice J handed down judgment in LCG v OVD [2023] EWHC 2058 (KB). [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:17 pm
State, 19 So. 3d 1172, 1174 - 75 (Fla. 2009) (citing Wells v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 11:11 am
The text, as read by the plurality opinion in Perry v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 5:00 pm
Curren v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 6:38 am
Coombe asserted a defense of qualified immunity with respect to the constitutional claims, where "government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory of constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known", quoting Harlow v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:12 pm
Does 1–3 v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 1:02 pm
Where does the court draw the line ? [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:20 pm
In Johnson v. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:21 am
So where does this leave the dispute? [read post]
18 May 2010, 11:29 pm
The court noted that the Fifth Circuit had, in Riley v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:41 am
It is enough to decide that the law does not entitle the abortion providers to a federal judicial order shielding them from the consequences of violating the state law at issue. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
