Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 5441 - 5460 of 12,444
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2017, 12:59 pm
|Launch Event: Advancing women in tech, law and policy, ChIPs comes to London on 27 April 2017|Am I covered by that UK copyright exception? [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:17 am
|Launch Event: Advancing women in tech, law and policy, ChIPs comes to London on 27 April 2017|Am I covered by that UK copyright exception? [read post]
3 May 2017, 1:05 pm
Instead, he filed with the Magistrate Judge a motion to quash the Government's application to compel decryption, arguing that his act of decrypting the devices would violate his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.On August 27, 2015, the Magistrate Judge denied Doe's Motion to Quash and directed Doe to fully comply with the Decryption Order (the `Quashal Denial'). [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:53 am by Phillips & Associates
Sex discrimination, including sexual harassment, constitutes an “unlawful discriminatory practice” under the NYCHRL, id. at § 8-107(1)(a). [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:29 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
The Act should be amended to provide for the mandatory release of holdback, but not the mandatory early release of holdback; that is to say, “may” should be revised to “shall” in sections 26 and 27 of the Act. [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:33 am by Tom Kosakowski
Michigan State University is set to host the 15th Annual Summer Academic Ombuds Meeting is set for June 26-27 at Michigan State University. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 7:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
An April 27, 2017 post on the Wiley Rein law firm’s Executive Summary Blog about the decision can be found here. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
She has said that it is another example where ‘vulgar language used as reprimand does not amount to defamation. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:30 am
An AIPPI Rapid Response Event | UK UPC ratification still on track despite Article 50 trigger | Does Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Teva v MSD show just how large a role patent law has come to play in assessing SPC validity? [read post]