Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2011, 6:17 am
I have fond memories of Dorset Yacht Co Ltd v Home Office [1970] AC 1004 from my days as a law student. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:40 am
In 1984, the California Supreme Court ruled unequivocally in Hartzell v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:51 am
Although the decision of the Bundesgerichtshof is undoubtedly well reasoned, it reaches the opposite conclusion to recent English case law: in particular, the English Court of Appeal has (even before Brexit) taken the contrary view that the use of a foreign contractual language or a standard form contract tailored to international transactions would even on a standalone basis be sufficient to constitute a relevant international element – and accordingly allow the parties to… [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:09 am
Comparing pre-1 July 2012 eligibility requirements – ENS v RSMS DIAC has released two documents which compare the permanent residency visas under the ENS and RSMS pathways. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm
Indie-v-PlanB-Complaint [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 11:55 am
In Wurdemann v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
The case is entitled Grainger, P.L.C. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 12:21 pm
The case, Syrnik v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 11:36 pm
In particular, the author’s analysis of the springboard doctrine, which has recently been the subject of litigation in the English courts, is a reminder that the Indian law on this point has some way to go to acquire a coherent shape. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:15 am
This is like an even dorkier version of the Team Edward v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 6:25 am
It's Case T-233/10 Nike International Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Intermar Simanto Nahmias, a General Court (First Chamber) decision on a Community trade mark (CTM) appeal that harks back all the way to 25 May. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 7:17 pm
Williams v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:16 am
” Why should an English resident or domiciled claimant be denied the right to sue in England if the publisher happens to be domiciled outside Europe and a defamatory allegation has been published not only inEngland but also in one or more other countries? [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:56 am
v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
In Western Oilfield Equipment Rentals Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
On Monday 7 March 2016, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Willers v Joyce & Anor (in substitution for and in their capacity as executors of Albert Gubay (deceased)), which raises the issue of whether the Courts of England and Wales should continue to treat decisions of the Privy Council, made by a board comprising solely of serving Supreme Court Justices who have heard full argument and made their decision on the basis of English Law, as having no status as legal… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
Ambrose Harris (Procurator Fiscal), HM Advocate v G : HM Advocate v M [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) – read judgment Reliance on evidence that emerged from questioning a person without access to a lawyer did not invariably breach the right to a fair trial under Article 6. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:00 am
See Long v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:36 pm
However, the Apple v Samsung cases pending before several national courts in Europe expose the inherent limitations of such provisions. [read post]
