Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 5441 - 5460 of 6,584
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Affirming this decision on appeal, the Superior Court found the clause to be clear and unambiguous and summarily rejected the plaintiffs' public policy arguments.Offsetting BenefitsThe Pennsylvania Superior Court handed down a monumental UIM decision in the case of Pusl v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:27 pm by Orin Kerr
The Ohio state judge granted the warrant, even though the Ohio warrant statute only allows magistrates to issue warrants to search within the court's jurisdiction. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:54 am by Matt C. Bailey
Superior Court, 141 Cal.App.4th 290 (2006), an opinion issued just prior to the California Supreme Court granted review in Tobacco II. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm by Greg May
” When a court begins its analysis with that sentence, as the court in Le v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:50 am by Moseley Collins
Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 458-459, the function of a new trial motion is to allow a reexamination of an issue of fact. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 5:37 am by John J. Cord
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania’s first level appellate court) decided in Simon v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:06 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Chelak of the Pike County Court of Common Pleas utilized the "trivial defect doctrine" to grant summary judgment in favor of a gas station owner in Melchiorre v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 5:49 am by Anthony J. Vecchio
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Docket No. 58780. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 3:26 am by Richard Renner
Judge Joan Zeldon of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia has denied a preliminary injunction sought by the National Football League Players Association (NFLPA). [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:30 pm by Rick
Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1355 [59 Cal.Rptr.3d 363].) [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 6:20 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Pedal Pennsylvania, Inc., 974 A.2d 1233 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2009), the Pennsylvania Superior Court continued to question the ongoing validity of the doctrine in the case of Zeidman v. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 5:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Wikipedia entry for "It's a Wonderful Life" references the Supreme Court case Stewart v. [read post]