Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 5441 - 5460
of 21,691
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2022, 9:21 am
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
The case-law of a Member State, while it is not binding on the EU Courts, may provide relevant indications about the relevant public’s perception of the sign at issue in that state (see para 58, with reference to GC judgment T-40/03 – Julián Murúa Entrena, EU:T:2005:285, para 69). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
The case-law of a Member State, while it is not binding on the EU Courts, may provide relevant indications about the relevant public’s perception of the sign at issue in that state (see para 58, with reference to GC judgment T-40/03 – Julián Murúa Entrena, EU:T:2005:285, para 69). [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 1:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:23 am
Murphy, Global Governance over the Long Haul Mark Mazower, Response Martha Finnemore, Dynamics of Global Governance: Building on What We Know [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
“ The Appellate Division said that the fact that the complainant's application was designated as "pre-screened" indicating that it had passed through the online portion of the hiring process and “was not marked ineligible. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
“ The Appellate Division said that the fact that the complainant's application was designated as "pre-screened" indicating that it had passed through the online portion of the hiring process and “was not marked ineligible. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:07 am
- International Law and Peace Settlements, edited by Marc Weller, Mark Retter and Andrea Varga; and Lawyering Peace, by Paul Williams [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:06 pm
Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 1:15 pm
Alcon Vision, LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 8:31 am
Souratgar, 720 F.3d at 103 (internal quotation marks, citations, and emphasis omitted); see also Norden-Powers v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 3:41 am
Billy Goat IP LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:20 am
Section 14 of the Lanham Act states that "[a]ny person who believes that he is or will be damaged … by the registration of a mark” may file a petition to cancel the registration. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Vasileía tou Theoú, (South Dakota Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 2, 2020).Brian Owsley, Is The Supreme Court Irrational: Trump v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 6:18 am
§ 11-1201 states that a “trade secret” is “information… that (1) derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (2) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:55 am
The Supreme Court in Ratilal Panachand Gandhi v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:56 am
One can hope this marks a trend for all cases predicated upon such arguments. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 12:08 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
