Search for: "May v. State" Results 5441 - 5460 of 119,555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm by Donald Thompson
 That any failure to meet the constitutional standard may have been through oversight and not intentional is irrelevant to the test for suggestiveness (United States v Wade, 388 US 218 at 228, 229, 235 [1967]). [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS, MATRIX
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 3:54 pm by Jeff Gittins
The Utah Supreme Court recently issued its opinion in the case of Haik v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:27 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Hall v Harris & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 671 (22 May 2012) Ryanair Holdings Plc v The Office of Fair Trading & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 643 (22 May 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Smeaton v Equifax Plc [2012] EWHC 2088 (QB) (11 May 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Aerostar Maintenance International Ltd & Anor v Wilson & Ors [2012] EWHC 1353 (Ch) (04 May 2012)… [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 9:40 am by sally
High Court (Administrative Court) Roszas, R (on the application of) v Baranya County Court Hungary [2010] EWHC 1265 (Admin) (18 May 2010) Dikmonas, R (on the application of) v Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania [2010] EWHC 1222 (Admin) (18 May 2010) Sanyaolu v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC B9 (Admin) (temporary reference) (17 May 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by LTA-Editor
By Caitlin Forsyth Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]