Search for: "State v. Bodi"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 14,865
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2017, 2:44 pm
” Alice Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:01 am
In 2014, the Supreme Court ruled in Riley v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:10 pm
Supreme Court has interpreted §101 several times, most recently in Mayo Collaborative Services v Prometheus Laboratories, 132 S. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
In Florence v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 8:55 am
This Article is the third in a series examining Supreme Court, lower court, and state school actors’ treatment of children in schools: together, they show that school searches and school discipline, combined with school interrogations, create a body of law that often treats children as disposable. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am
" United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 7:37 am
For instance, a state government can't delegate to a church the power to veto the licensing of a bar—that's the doctrine of Larkin v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 3:46 pm
Stern v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 4:21 pm
I’m eagerly awaiting the judgment in R(Weaver) v London & Quadrant, but, in one of those quirks of synchronicity, Bailii has just put the Court of Appeal Judgment in Donoghue v Poplar Housing & Regeneration Community Association Ltd & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 595 up online. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:20 pm
The case of Hale v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:20 pm
The case of Hale v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:49 am
” The petition further states : “That a register of such membership is held by the various bodies that supervise such judicial and quasi-judicial tribunals and that access to these registers is given on demand to the defendant, litigant, or plaintiff wishing to exercise their rights to a fair hearing in accordance with Article 6 of the ECHR. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 6:41 am
Overbroad Anti-Speech Injunction Week continues here at the Volokh Conspiracy (see this post and this one), with a case decided Tuesday by the Arizona Court of Appeals, Streeter v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:36 pm
His lawyer (not Sy Gaer) filed a for a writ of habeas corpus to bring the body of the defendant to a district court. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Disclosing information the officer or employee believes constitutes an improper governmental actionGaffney v Addison, 2015 NY Slip Op 07372, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentThe chief operator of the water treatment plant for the City of Watertown, Brian D. [read post]
31 May 2020, 10:00 pm
The May 2020 decision is a blow to the Agricultural industry who was hopeful for a similar outcome in Europe to that of the United States Supreme Court here in JEM Ag Supply v Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., 534 U.S. 124, (2001), litigated by the attorneys here at MVS. [read post]
26 May 2013, 2:50 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 8:51 am
The Supreme Court reminds us of this principle in a case that was so clear to them that they ruled upon without oral argument.The case is Stanton v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 1:14 am
However, this commentary is in his personal capacity and his stated interest is purely academic. [read post]
