Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 5441 - 5460 of 14,194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
 The judge wielded a "broad axe" and assessed the loss of profits at £14.45 per unit x 1,755 units i.e. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 12:14 pm by Josh Blackman
For example, in 2009 the Court held such a special session, to re-argue Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
Tough questions greeted counsel for both sides of this case—a seemingly mundane dispute about playgrounds and tire scraps that has potentially wide-ranging implications for the contours of religious liberty in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Chris Mirasola, Yishai Schwartz
Pursuant to a FOIA request from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), the FISA Court has released 18 redacted opinions regarding FISA Section 702. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:16 am by Staley Smith
Writing for the majority in Maslenjak v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 9:14 am by Steven Boutwell
The United States Coast Guard named Settoon the strictly liable Responsible Party under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA 90”) (codified at 33 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the “theme out of the United States Supreme Court [yesterday was] materiality. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
Mesa: In this case, the justices will decide what standard courts should use to determine whether the Fourth Amendment applies outside the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"The United States Supreme Court has applied a two-part test to determine whether there was a right of access under the First Amendment [see Press-Enterprise Co. v Superior Ct. of Cal., County of Riverside, 478 US 1, 8-10], and the [New York State] Court of Appeals has used that test to determine whether there is a right of access to a professional disciplinary hearing;4. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 1:59 pm by John Floyd
  On April 14, 2017, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 3:12 am by Scott Bomboy
The IRAP case involves a temporary injunction on part of the Trump executive order that allows for a 90-day temporary ban on immigrants from six Middle Eastern countries arriving in the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by NCC Staff
" The Court moved closed to the Johnson decision in 1974, when it said in Spence v. [read post]