Search for: "United States v. Justice" Results 5441 - 5460 of 32,500
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2021, 5:51 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" Put another way, "the degree to which a challenged rule has a long pedigree or is in widespread use in the United States is a circumstance that must be taken into account. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and of the four dissenters in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 5:37 am by SHG
So what did Justice Alito have to say about it? [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Third, R (on the application of AB) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
United States The Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal of Shkelzen Berisha, the son of Albania’s former prime minister, who said the book that became the movie “War Dogs” falsely linked him to arms dealers. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 9:24 pm by Gene Takagi
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled on July 1 that California could not mandate the disclosure of major donors by charities to the State even though such disclosure is already required to be made to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 5:25 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
United States, the justices are asked to consider the scope of the confrontation clause in the context of incentives given for accomplice testimony. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 2:55 am by Scott Bomboy
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the decision in 1977 by a 2-1 margin, with each judge writing separate opinions. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
United States (University of Arkansas News).Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 10:18 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 556 U.S. 129, 137 (2009), by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, see McKeever v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
(Discussed with its conseqeunce for state liability with respect to the conduct of their SOEs HERE). [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
He is also incorrect to suggest that it makes any difference whether an appellate court, when rejecting an Edwards v Bairstow challenge, expresses its agreement with the conclusion of the fact-finding tribunal or states only that the tribunal was entitled to reach that conclusion on the material before it. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 4:46 pm by Sophia Cope
When a company or an employee leads the company’s operations from within the United States and pockets profits from human rights abuses suffered abroad, the courts in the United States must exercise jurisdiction to hold them accountable. [read post]