Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 152,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2012, 11:13 am
The Statement of Issues for the Iskanian v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
" Addressing a procedural matter, the Appellate Division observing the fact DOE's Position Statement was "unsigned and undated hearsay", said "[h]earsay evidence can be the basis for an administrative determination", citing Matter of Gray v Adduci, 73 NY2d 741, and "this Court need not limit our review to the language in the Citywide Panel's decision, as the Panel noted that it had reviewed the DOE's determination as well as… [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
" Addressing a procedural matter, the Appellate Division observing the fact DOE's Position Statement was "unsigned and undated hearsay", said "[h]earsay evidence can be the basis for an administrative determination", citing Matter of Gray v Adduci, 73 NY2d 741, and "this Court need not limit our review to the language in the Citywide Panel's decision, as the Panel noted that it had reviewed the DOE's determination as well as… [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 8:59 am
What does the decision in Riegel v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 6:10 am
Leadsinger, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 6:09 am
July 2, 2009).* Discretion whether to tow and inventory does not make it unreasonable if it is justified. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:30 am
In Glorvigen v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 4:07 pm
The Miranda warning originates from the 1966 Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:41 am
The Florida Supreme Court majority opinion wrote in the 2002 case of Malicki, et al v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 10:03 pm
A good example is Myers v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 4:00 am
What does that mean? [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:05 am
Eastpointe Condominium I Association, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
From Judge Reed O'Connor's order today in Doe v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:36 am
The California Supreme Court has just issued its decision in Iskanian v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 2:33 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 1:12 pm
See R-S-C v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:18 am
"] From Starbuck v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:38 am
And I can see that those who would like Apple to "destroy" (as Steve Jobs put it) Android in court (for which Apple's own customers would also pay the price) increasingly realize that Apple does not appear to be, if the results of more than four years of litigation are any indication, a nuclear world power.I did want to add a few general thoughts. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 6:41 pm
[Does DOJ now go to the shadow docket?] [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
