Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 9,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2013, 3:37 am
If you have been charged in a Municipal Court within the State of New Jersey with any of the following offenses, you may be eligible for a Conditional Discharge pursuant to NJSA 2C:36-A-1: NJSA 2C:35-10(c), failure to turn over CDS to an officer "failure to turn over;" NJSA 2C:35-10(a)(4), possession of less than 50 grams of marijuana; NJSA 2C:35-10(b), under the influence of CDS; NJSA 2C:36-2, possession of drug paraphernalia. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 6:54 pm
Colorado clearly does not stick to the trends. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
My blog for @CenDemTech about why this is v. worrisome. https://www.cdt.org/blogs/gs-hans/0611overbroad-subpoena-airbnb-user-data-smacks-general-warrant … “Does the U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
Michigan law does not allow insurers to be sued for “bad faith denials. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
The cited prior art does appear to "anticipate" my independent claim by inherently showing each element of it. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 2:58 am
It does not make sense. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 7:22 pm
” The Examiner rejected the original claim as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
Rev. 800 (1983) (READ PARTS II and III) 1. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 12:12 pm
The owner of Ike’s Restaurant stated that he does carry over kibbeh from one day to the next. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 5:01 am
Patent 6,663,347 B2 (hereinafter “the’347 Patent”).3 The Board’s jurisdiction for this appeal is under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:32 am
§ 1295(a)(1). [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:05 am
The issues in Ex parte MAIERAppealed claims 1-21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:42 am
First, Appellants contend that this rejection is overcome “if the objection to the specification under 35 [U.S.C. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:55 am
We also affirm the district court’s denial of SK’s request for attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 6:41 am
from Ex parte Budde With respect to the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:13 am
They say that bad facts make bad law, and that was proven yet again earlier this year with Righthaven’s resounding defeat on the standing issue in the Ninth Circuit.1 I have uploaded a copy of the Ninth Circuit’s opinion to Scribd. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 12:10 pm
I find out today that her Primary care doctor has been charging her a $35 copay every time she sees her. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
We believe that it does.")), or to apply them (Scott v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Rasouli contended that the withdrawal of life support that does not provide any medical benefit to the patient does not require consent as it does not constitute a “treatment” as defined in the HCCA. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Rasouli contended that the withdrawal of life support that does not provide any medical benefit to the patient does not require consent as it does not constitute a “treatment” as defined in the HCCA. [read post]
