Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 11,201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2015, 10:31 am
USDoJ and Winchell & Alexander v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:07 am
Let’s talk about King v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
| Dutch diverge with English as Novartis prevails on Zoledronic Acid in Netherlands | Slogan and TMs | The coffee capsule wars | Declining public trust in innovation | IPEC’s ruling in Global Flood Defence Systems & Another v Van den Noort Innovations BV & Others | Again on CJEU ruling in Case C-419/13 Art & Allposters | Biotech financing: the risk components, ‘going long’ and patents as knowledge currency. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:00 am
On Wednesday the Court will also hear the appeal of R (Ali & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department regarding whether the requirement of an English test for those spouses or civil partners of a British citizen wishing to stay in the UK breached their partner’s rights under the ECHR, art 8, or whether the interference is proportionate to the aims of improving immigrants’ job prospects and ability to access health services. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 10:17 pm
I think Crawford v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
” In Burrage v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 9:15 pm
[Toronto Star; note the pioneering 2003 English case Tomlinson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm
This was confirmed in the case of Douglas & ors v Hello! [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 12:09 am
The first, surprise, change is ushered in by the Court of Appeal decision in Edwards v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
See for example Syndicat Northcrest v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 2:23 pm
Rule 14a-8(i)(7) Ordinary Business Operations The first, Rule 14a-8(i)(7), comes in the context of the recent Delaware District Court decision in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 2:23 pm
Rule 14a-8(i)(7) Ordinary Business Operations The first, Rule 14a-8(i)(7), comes in the context of the recent Delaware District Court decision in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 2:23 pm
Rule 14a-8(i)(7) Ordinary Business Operations The first, Rule 14a-8(i)(7), comes in the context of the recent Delaware District Court decision in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 9:59 am
Ltd v Daewoo Logistics [2015] EWHC 194 (Comm). [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
| Dutch diverge with English as Novartis prevails on Zoledronic Acid in Netherlands | Slogan and TMs | The coffee capsule wars | Declining public trust in innovation | IPEC’s ruling in Global Flood Defence Systems & Another v Van den Noort Innovations BV & Others | Again on CJEU ruling in Case C-419/13 Art & Allposters | Biotech financing: the risk components, ‘going long’ and patents as knowledge currency. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/DGSN5M0WQQ -> US: Gaylord v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
I don’t think there’s any incompatibility between this position and the position taken by the Supreme Court in Michigan v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
I don’t think there’s any incompatibility between this position and the position taken by the Supreme Court in Michigan v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
This kind of reasoning will be familiar to English lawyers. [read post]
