Search for: "Jackson v State" Results 5461 - 5480 of 6,130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2011, 10:01 pm by Marie Louise
(1709 Blog) Spain Law to shutdown P2P sites resurrected by Spanish coalition (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom When it’s too late to mend a broken patent – EWCA decision in Nokia GmbH v IPCOM GmbH & Co KG (PatLit) ‘Companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours’ – Apple sues Nokia in High Court (IPBiz) Infamous antipiracy lawyer, Andrew Crossley gives up, abandons P2P cases (ArsTechnica) (1709 Blog) (TorrentFreak)… [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:18 pm
In this subsection, "professional" means an individual who is licensed or certified by the state or who is an employee of a facility licensed, certified, or operated by the state and who, in the normal course of official duties or duties for which a license or certification is required, has direct contact with children. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:16 am by Sherry F. Colb
ColbIn Justice Alito's (SA's) leaked opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
Under the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Nieves v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 11:35 am by bndmorris
Beyer’s article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 8:09 pm
What happened in the trial court: After Kathy Johnson took the minor child back to Washington, Tobias Johnson filed the complaint in this case in the Jackson Circuit Court, seeking custody of the minor child. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]