Search for: "Little v State" Results 5461 - 5480 of 26,851
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Venkat Balasubramani
CUS Nashville Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 3:44 am by Susan Brenner
The fact Bell protested the seizure of his laptop adds little to the balancing because he nevertheless has not asked for its return.U.S. v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 12:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 176–180 (1803); intergovernmental tax immunity, McCulloch, 4 Wheat., at 435–436; executive privilege, United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
We note another interesting little twist in the government's argument on pages 11-12. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:57 am by Lindsay See
Lindsay See is the solicitor general of West Virginia, which led a group of 27 other states and the governor of Kentucky in a cert-stage amicus brief in support of the petitioners in The American Legion v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 1:14 pm
Greg May has brought to my attention a significant en banc decision, United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:47 am by SHG
  Even the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, masters of their domain when it comes to keeping drug dealers convicted and imprisoned, will jump as high as need be to appease the grocery clerk.Consider what happened in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 10:06 pm
Last week, SCHR filed five motions for summary judgment in Whitaker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:48 pm
For a civil procedure professor, you couldn't ask for any better teaching tool.The case also sheds a little bit of personal insight into the trials and tribulations (as well as the lives) of two of the plaintiff's attorneys: Danuta Tuszynska (a Riverside sole practitioner and Western State graduate) and Letitia Pepper (a Hastings graduate who also practices in Riverside). [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 10:33 am by Shea Denning
So I was a little surprised when the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit explained earlier this summer that the Supreme Court determined more than thirty years ago in South Dakota v. [read post]