Search for: "Masse v. Masse" Results 5461 - 5480 of 10,245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2014, 7:03 am by Elysia Cherry
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Friday, January 10, 2014:'Bell is not above the law,' says man awarded $21K for privacy breach Canada courting U.S. web giants in wake of NSA spy scandal Chicago law prof barred from campus for alleged angry comments claims disability right violation Protection Against Copyright Infringement Strengthened by SCC Robinson Case but at What CostRob Ford speaks favourably of marijuana decriminalizationA Canada Evidence Code… [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
American Standard, Inc., 179 P.3d 905, 914 (Cal. 2008) (“[r]equiring manufacturers to warn their products’ users in all instances would place an onerous burden on them and would invite mass consumer disregard and ultimate contempt for the warning process”); Thompson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
While Canadian judges, like their Commonwealth siblings, are unwilling to adopt a New York Times v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
Weinstein, Individual Justice in Mass Tort Litigation: The Effect of Class Actions, Consolidations, and other Multi-Party Devices 117 (1995) (“A court should not coerce independent eminent scientists, such as the late Dr. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 10:45 am
Conflicts of interest: the Supreme Court speaksOn July 5, 2013 the Supreme Court issued its judgment in Canadian National Railway v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:20 am by Dorsey
  See for example NY Civil Rights Law §51, Cal Civ Code §3344(a); Mass. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm by Ron Coleman
Drug and Device Law’s readership, so far as we could tell, consisted of (1) other lawyers at large firms who defended pharmaceutical product liability cases, (2) plaintiffs’ lawyers who labored on the opposite side of that “v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am by Marty Lederman
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]