Search for: "Read v. United States" Results 5461 - 5480 of 30,128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2021, 7:21 pm
This post aims to answer a simple question: what is the highest number of amendments to a complaint that has ever been allowed by a court in the United States? [read post]
20 May 2021, 12:07 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
One of the roles of the President BOA is defined in Rule 12c(2) EPC, which reads: "On a proposal from the President of the Boards of Appeal and after the President of the European Patent Office has been given the opportunity to comment, the Committee set up under paragraph 1 shall adopt the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal and of the Enlarged Board of Appeal. [read post]
20 May 2021, 8:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Officers of the United States must be nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate; inferior Officers may be appointed by a head-of-department if authorized by Congress. [read post]
Case date: 26 March 2021 Case number: No. 19-35925 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
Case date: 26 March 2021 Case number: No. 19-35925 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:30 am by S S
The claimants argued that, reliant on M v Newham [2020] EWHC 32, the duty was immediate, unqualified and non-deferrable. [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:47 pm by John Elwood
United States, 20-6387, involving prohibitions on delay in prosecution of criminal cases; three-time relist Allen v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am by Jonathan Shaub
They implicate fundamental questions about the role of courts in the United States’s constitutional structure. [read post]
18 May 2021, 8:39 am by J. Alexander Lawrence
In 2019, the parents of two of the boys commenced an action against Snap, the owner and operator of Snapchat, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
18 May 2021, 8:39 am by J. Alexander Lawrence
In 2019, the parents of two of the boys commenced an action against Snap, the owner and operator of Snapchat, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
18 May 2021, 8:39 am by J. Alexander Lawrence
In 2019, the parents of two of the boys commenced an action against Snap, the owner and operator of Snapchat, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:01 am by George Croner
Targeting, however, is constrained by specific limitations included by Congress that prohibit targeting anyone known to be in the United States; prohibit targeting any U.S. person located outside the United States; prohibit targeting someone outside the United States for the purpose of targeting a particular, known person in this country; prohibit the intentional acquisition of any communication where all participants are located in the… [read post]
17 May 2021, 10:01 pm by Steven Dawson
  The Court found, in a 2-1 decision, that in 2020, the United States District Court for California, Southern District (San Diego) had abused its discretion when it enjoined the State of California from enforcing AB-5 against motor carriers doing business in California (on the ground that such enforcement was preempted by F4A) (our prior article on the District Court’s ruling can be read here). [read post]