Search for: "See v. See" Results 5461 - 5480 of 122,046
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2009, 7:35 am
When motion to dismiss is not sufficiently specific there is not a preserved issue of law before the appellate court (See People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484 [2008](discussed here).One would think that fourteen years later defense attorneys would be familiar with and comply with the requirement that there be a specific motion for a trial order of dismissal. [read post]