Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 10,139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
However NM argued that Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust [1999] ECC 167 extended this duty to disclose risks where “there is a significant risk which would affect the judgment of a reasonable patient”[4]. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
In short, the United States believes that the litigation’s further progress might risk the release of national security information. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm
S. 633 (2010) (quoting, for its current relevance, statement in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
The hotel, which offered a mixture of regular rooms for short-term guests and suites for long-term inmates, was favoured by numerous celebrities of the day whose autographs were assiduously solicited and then shown around at school, to the general envy of all concerned. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 2:41 pm
Shaddy v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
Beyond these two strands, we were introduced to the great modern structures of law making in the United States. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
See also United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule 28.3(b) (Citation Form; Certification) (Aug. 1, 2011) (“For each legal proposition supported by citations in the argument, counsel must cite to any opposing authority if such authority is binding on this court, e.g., U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
The key law relied upon in the case, the Alien Tort Statute, requires, after a 2013 Supreme Court decision called Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum, that plaintiffs show that the matter “touch and concern” the United States in order for the case to proceed here. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Similarly in Pollen v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:37 am
Although I try to include on this blog topics involving issues from outside the United States, because of my background and experience, U.S-related topics tend to predominate. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
They may also originate in state action, either to support private rights or to allow state agents (law enforcement officials, tax collectors, and so on) to do their business. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:53 am
United States, 198 Fed. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:57 pm
Further, the the Supreme Court of United States declined hearing the case, because the court determined that such a law did not violate the federal Commerce Clause. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 10:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:51 am
United States, 302 U. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:43 am
I have a short piece in today's Irish Independent on the remarkable legal battle between Microsoft and US prosecutors over access to data on non-US users which is stored outside the US, which has now resulted in a finding that Microsoft is in contempt of court.The Irish Independent doesn't currently include inline links to resources in stories, so for background here are:The Magistrate Judge's original ruling that Microsoft must hand over the data;The opinion of Michael… [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 5:46 am
State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
Dorris v. [read post]
