Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 5461 - 5480 of 19,219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Sophie Corke
See coverage on FOSS Patents, JUVE Patent, Legal Patent, and the Kluwer Patent Blog - and, of course, the IPKat - for more.Over on Comparative Patent Remedies, Thomas Cotter commented on the UK Supreme Court's recent "well-reasoned" decision in Secretary of State for Health v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:54 am
Since the earlier marks had an average distinctiveness, the Board held that there was a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.Now it was RCB's turn to appeal. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:52 am
The Registrar rejected this claim, since a society could use different marks to denote its services.Section 7(5) TMA In relation to “HARVARD CLUB OF SINGAPORE”, the Opponent relied on S7(5) TMA, which states that a “trade mark shall not be registered if or to the extent that its use is prohibited in Singapore by any written law or rule of law”. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage of the solicitor general’s motion in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:37 am by Steve Baird
In support of its federal dilution claim, Wawa points to a 1997 federal trademark dilution decision (Wawa v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:18 am by JD Hull
Stern predicts that, in a new Florida case before Supreme Court, the Court's holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 1:45 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
This year marks the 10th anniversary of the Court of Justice’s (CJEU) landmark judgment in Pepsico v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic (C-281/10P). [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 1:00 am by Douglas Kans
The state’s highest court dealt with the issue of vehicle forfeiture in the recently released opinion, Laura Patino v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 1:00 am by Douglas Kans
The state’s highest court dealt with the issue of vehicle forfeiture in the recently released opinion, Laura Patino v. [read post]