Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 8,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2017, 9:19 am
United States, 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 6:45 am
Blatt, arguing on behalf of the United States, took the position that the case before the Court was not moot because the second bankruptcy case was still on appeal to the U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
The Court decided, however, that the “conclusion of direct review” prong is not available to petitioners who fail to seek direct review all the way up to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 9:20 am
The Court concluded, however, that the “conclusion of direct review” prong is not available to petitioners who fail to seek direct review all the way up to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: It’s Not Rocket Science, But It’s Still a Matter of Agency Expertise
27 Mar 2022, 7:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:31 pm
United States, 134 S. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:00 am
Aultman (1898) and United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
,Petitioners,v.THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGECOUNTY,Respondent;AURORA LOAN SERVICES, et al. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
CPLR § 2106 also provides: ”(b) The statement of any person, when that person is physically located outside the geographic boundaries of the United States, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, subscribed and affirmed by that person to be true under the penalties of perjury, may be used in an action in lieu of and with the same force and… [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:23 pm
For the reasons stated in Judge Manion’s partial dissent, 799 F. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 7:55 am
Vilsack and United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 10:44 am
Because the dissent didn’t carry the day, Gates has immediate consequences for private clients throughout the United States who tear down their houses, and build new homes on their property. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:24 am
S., at 204; United States v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:24 pm
On March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom declared a state of emergency relating to the pandemic. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:25 pm
United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:01 pm
United States, in which the petitioner was charged with violating a federal statute forbidding the possession or use of chemical weapons. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:03 am
s habitual residence, Hollis consented to her moving to the United States with H.L.O. indefinitely. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:54 pm
" The 2001 paper of Quillen and Webster stated that the grant rate was within a range, and never explicitly asserted that the grant rate [*1071] was 97%. n16 Nevertheless, the 97% number persists in the legal literature, along with the perception that the examination process at the United States Patent Office [USPTO] lacks quality.See also LBE, Comment on "Patent Grant Rates at the United States Patent and Trademark Office" , 4 Chi. [read post]
