Search for: "Beare v. State" Results 5481 - 5500 of 15,039
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2017, 10:20 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While Congress continues to debate the future of the Obamacare health reforms and its exchanges, the Department of Health & Human Services is reminding employers with less than 50 employees that wish to offer group health coverage for their employees to check out their coverage options offered the Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) Marketplace established as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am by Jane Chong
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
It is affiliated with the State owned Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting. [read post]
6 May 2017, 5:24 am by SHG
Hold my beer, the United States Supreme Court replies in Tolan v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The hashtag “DontBePushy” gained popularity among avowedly centrist pundits.The Times also continued to run stories about Clinton’s emails, and one news article crossed over into commentary by suggesting that Republicans were “not necessarily wrong” to say that FBI Director James Comey should have said that he was willing to issue arrest warrants to Clinton and her advisors in connection with the Anthony Wiener emails in October, even though nothing in those emails was… [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:55 pm by Samantha Maddern and Heather McIntyre
  DP Binet stated at [59] that: “where the employer seeks to rely on the incorporated material being freely available in the public domain online, the employer bears the onus of establishing that providing access online is reasonable in the circumstances. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:00 am by Scott Bomboy
Without comment, the nine Justices declined on Monday to take the case of Alaska v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
The AG’s office had concluded “that an outright ban on the possession of electronic arms within the state … would likely not pass constitutional muster” in light of Caetano v. [read post]