Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 5481 - 5500 of 13,850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2014, 1:34 pm
Here are a few quickie suggestions of how you might act should you prefer not to be in the papers tomorrow... 1. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:55 am
In such circumstances, and in so far as that rebuttable presumption is not rebutted, the act of posting a hyperlink to a work which was illegally placed on the internet constitutes a ‘communication to the public’ within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 12:15 pm
., because copyright does not protect “useful articles. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 8:37 am by Marcel Pemsel
This term could be defined as a website containing numerous obvious IP infringements over an extended period of time, which website does not indicate the name and address of the operator (as required by Art. 5(1) of Directive 2000/31/EC), and does not provide an effective notice-and-take-down mechanism, or the operator does not react to cease-and-desist requests. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:47 am
  If it does not like UltraViolet’s opinion and does not need its money, why try to hide behind a dubious copyright claim? [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 9:24 am by Daniel J. Gilman
And the “report does not make recommendations or conclusions reg [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:08 pm by Jay Fishman
Securities Act Section 36b-6(c)(1):* Foreign private advisers as defined in 1940-Act Sections 202(a)(3) , 203(b)(3) and corresponding 1940-Act rules.* Investment advisers registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission as commodity trading advisors that meet the exemption conditions of 1940-Act Section 203(b)(6), as well as the requirement (for "commodity trading advisors advising about private funds" defined in 1940-Act Section 202(a)(29)) that the commodity… [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:32 pm
There is no dispute that Alzheimer’s is indeed a “disease,” a characterization that usually implies a status process that someone does not choose, and cannot avoid. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 5:12 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The amended statement of claim does not plead that Chevron Canada was a party to the Ecuadorian action or an agent of Chevron. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 4:14 am by Andres
’The laws in question are the InfoSoc Directive (Directive 2001/29/EC) and the Brussels I Regulation (Regulation No 44/2001) respectively. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
The objections tend to be three-fold: (1) grammatical confusion, (2) record confusion, and (3) personal beliefs. [read post]