Search for: "Husband v. Wife"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 6,703
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2010, 11:39 am
Cohen v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 12:05 pm
When the parties divorced in 2005 under a settlement agreement that required the husband to pay the wife $7.5 million in 2006, but the former husband paid his ex-wife twelve days late, a divided Connecticut court of appeals upheld an award of interest from the date of the parties’ 2005 settlement agreement because the settlement agreement required interest ‘from the date hereof’ if the ex-husband were late on the 2006 payment. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:05 am
In Goldberg v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 1:11 pm
These relationships include that of attorney and client, guardian and ward, principal and agent, pastor and parishioner, husband and wife, and, as in this case, parent and child. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
In the typical, heterosexual, marital context, all 3 of these factors will point to the same people (i.e. a husband and wife will be the biological parents, they will behave like parents, and they will have intended to be parents, at least from the moment they discovered the pregnancy). [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:32 pm
The plaintiff was Function Media LLC, a patent holding company owned by husband-and-wife inventors Michael Dean and Lucinda Stone. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 5:03 am
The wife raised this issue in McElveen v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 8:43 pm
In the case of Mistretta v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:32 am
A husband and wife were divorced in Fulton County in 1997 and the wife was granted custody of the parties’ child. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 10:58 am
In the Ontario case Gordon v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 9:05 pm
On appeal in the case of Crespo v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:06 pm
But soon after McPherson, the 9th Circuit decided Mattos v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:37 am
Fairbanks v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:53 pm
Hickox v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:10 pm
In addition, and even though the husband was a criminal, the husband should not be required to pay the wife’s attorney’s fees of $20,000 when the husband received only a few thousand dollars more than that in the divorce. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 5:30 am
(Chan had a wife who probably also thought of him as her husband, because he was.) [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 2:53 pm
Husband and wife separated in mid-April 2006. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 2:16 pm
In Karpien v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:42 am
Buddenberg v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:18 pm
Bauman v. [read post]
