Search for: "In re Doe"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 107,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2017, 5:17 am
Does your firm make the list? [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 1:54 pm
Utah Labor Commission (Utah, December 1, 2017) (affirming Labor Commission order denying compensation benefits: Utah Code § 34A-2-417(2)(a)(ii) is a statute of repose, but it nevertheless constitutional under the Open Courts Clause of the Utah Constitution)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 5:44 am
The statute does what it sounds like it does, giving universities a legal pass for doing things like shifting in-person instruction online during the pandemic. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 1:46 pm
The examiner does not use Asai to reject claim 5. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 9:29 pm
Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust (10th Cir., December 16, 2016) (affirming summary judgment against plaintiffs because the trust was neither arbitrary nor capricious in withholding benefits for failure to complete necessary IRS levy forms)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:46 am
Is it because we're in the northern hemisphere — that is, does it have to do with clocks, which were modeled on sundials? [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:46 am
Of course it does. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:15 am
Yes, he does: "It means you pretend to be telling the truth when you’re not. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 3:55 pm
Director, Office of Workers' Compenstion Programs (10th Cir., December 20, 2017) (affirming award to petitioner of black lung benefits)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
24 May 2018, 8:16 am
Trump does have his own special way of being imprecise and deceitful, so it does stand out, but that's a positive, I'd say, because: 1. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 3:48 pm
Why does your interpretation of the facts make sense? [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 7:22 am
"The worse regular civilization does and the less you trust, the better crypto does... [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 6:14 am
Res. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:43 am
Concrete does not. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:01 am
"Applicant contended that its product, a liquid or gel, does not "seal" the wart because it does not form an airtight closure over the wart. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 8:15 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., December 10, 2015) (affirming denial of disability insurance benefits)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:39 am
This speaks more of someone with a short attention span than it does of genius, sadly, but it does also mean that more things get done.... .. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 1:21 pm
Furthermore, an IPR does not resolve infringement, so if the retailer does not invalidate all the asserted claims, the retailer still has a problem.One separately notes that "inter partes review" was meant to replace the previously existing procedure of "inter partes re-examination. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 6:29 pm
We’re fighting it. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:08 pm
Mary’s University Online (10th Cir., August 11, 2015) (affirming dismissal of Martin’s complaint for failure to comply with the district court’s order that she attach a right-to-sue letter to her complaint)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
