Search for: "Little v State"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 26,851
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2019, 7:07 am
Following a bench trial in the DRW case, the judge rejected the CFTC’s theory of manipulation, stating that it was “only the CFTC’s Enforcement Division that has persisted in its cry of market manipulation, based on little more than an ‘earth is flat’-style conviction that such manipulation must have happened because the market remained illiquid. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:21 pm
On 4 November 2019 Warby J gave judgment in the case of Lord Sheikh v Associated Newspapers [2019] EWHC 2947 (QB) finding that a MailOnline article made a defamatory allegation against the the claimant, a Conservative Member of the House of Lords. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 12:53 pm
There's a fight about the degree to which Section 14201 of the Elections Code requires the California Secretary of State to post facsimile ballot materials in languages other than English. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:45 am
See Mozes v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:05 am
I’m then joined by my colleague Professor Jeremy DeBeer to discuss the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision on Keatley Surveying v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Or, as the Supreme Court noted in Arizona v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 3:25 am
Unicut Corp. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:17 pm
United States The libel action by former Sheriff Joe Arpaio against CNN, Rolling Stone and the Huffington Post has been dismissed by a US District Court. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
” In its 2018 decision in Ohio v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Freedman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 12:20 pm
International Inst. of Management v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
But each largely makes four basic points: (a) The concept of executive privilege is hotly disputed; (b) there are very few relevant court cases and none that provide definitive answers; (c) there are a number of historical incidents, from the administration of George Washington to that of Barack Obama, that are of debatable—and contested—significance; and (d) the legal resolution of these highly disputed questions is likely of little practical significance. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 2:01 pm
On October 24, 2019, the Federal Court of Australia issued a post-trial Order in the TPT Patrol Pty Ltd as trustee for Amies Superannuation Fund v Myer Holdings Limited. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
My poster child: Gordon v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:05 pm
It reminds me a little of the ways courts have been interpreting Illinois’ BIPA. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 10:32 am
And that co-op sponsored one of my little league teams. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:11 am
The Court was then reinforcing the weight to be attached to the medical evidence and adding just a little further nuance to the guidance in Shala v Birmingham CC about the way in which reviewing officers should approach the medical evidence. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
” (Last quoting Jensen v. [read post]
