Search for: "Matter of Robert T"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 10,570
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
Mariani is also a recipient of the Robert M. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:47 am
A judgment winner doesn’t have to appeal, . . . that’s the general rule, right? [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 10:19 pm
"Is it worthwhile as a practical matter? [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
So this is a very fact intensive matter, and the court reviewed in great detail the facts supporting domicile in each state. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
Chief Justice John Roberts asked what Kansas thought of its chances if the matter were sent back to the Republican River Compact Administration, for resolution. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:28 am
That may be just restating the question, but gives some indication on how some of the justices are approaching the matter. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:28 am
That may be just restating the question, but gives some indication on how some of the justices are approaching the matter. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 5:51 pm
"I'd say why should you treat fact matters here different than any other case. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 1:02 pm
Specifically, while the proposal could have been drafted better, it wasn’t fatally unclear. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: [With deference,] two different district courts construing the same patent could come out to opposite results based on a subsidiary factual finding, and neither of those would be clearly erroneous, and yet on a public patent that is going to bind a lot of other people, people won’t know what to do. . . . . [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: [With deference,] two different district courts construing the same patent could come out to opposite results based on a subsidiary factual finding, and neither of those would be clearly erroneous, and yet on a public patent that is going to bind a lot of other people, people won’t know what to do. . . . . [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 10:30 am
Then it becomes, Breyer concluded, a matter of law. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Thus the determination of what is and what is not “testimonial” became the complicated inquiry under Crawford that the determination of “reliability” for nontraditional hearsay exceptions had previously been under Roberts. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:28 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes discusses the lack of explanations for some of the Court’s recent actions, concluding that “[t]he why of the Supreme Court’s action will remain a mystery until the court itself decides to reveal the answer. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:53 am
Wexler and Robert B. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 7:26 am
“Dems: Don’t trust the polls” by Niall Stanage in The Hill. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:28 am
Timku didn't make it up for him. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 3:27 am
The panel will discuss the extent to which family ownership affects disputes in LLCs and other unincorporated entities; whether family businesses are distinctive in ways that are legally relevant; and whether, as a practical matter, the statutory differences between LLCs, corporations, and other forms of business association matter. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
It’s not done under justification of the states secrets case law as a matter of common law. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 9:59 pm
" I don't know any artful way to say this, so I'll just blurt it out: The Robert Redford Building in Santa Monica is the coolest and best thought-out building I've ever seen or been in and you should just go see it. [read post]
