Search for: "State v. Sales"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 20,348
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2018, 7:33 am
In Barbuto v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:00 pm
The Court in Wayfair rejected the "physical presence test" for determining when remote (out-of-state) businesses must collect state and local sales tax. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
In this regard, New York v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 12:40 pm
Brave Law Firm, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:18 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:11 am
In Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 5:32 am
In Romer v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
” [Reuters; opinion in Oakland v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Following up on my previous posts: Law Profs Weigh In On Supreme Court's Wayfair Decision Clearing The Way For Sales Tax Collections From Out Of State Online Retailers (June 21, 2018) Hayes Holderness (Richmond), South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 12:32 am
In WesternGeco LLC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
If so, the retailer would not have to collect sales taxes in the way that in-state retailers must do. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
HOUSE BELOW GREEN TREE SERVICING, L.L.C.; WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; BEST INSURORS, INCORPORATED; MID STATE CAPITAL, L.L.C.; MID STATE TRUST II; MID STATE TRUST III; MID STATE TRUST IV; MID STATE TRUST V; MID STATE TRUST VI; MID STATE TRUST VII; MID STATE TRUST VIII; MID STATE TRUST IX; MID STATE TRUST X; MID STATE TRUST XI; WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY; MID-STATE… [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:02 am
In Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
For a consumer who has opted out of the sale of the consumer’s personal information, a business would be required to respect the consumer’s decision to opt out for at least 12 months before requesting that the consumer authorize the sale of the consumer’s personal information. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:57 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:08 am
” This is a broad definition, and because of the stated or not-stated intent of creating a distribution structure for tokens, the syndicates described above may well be considered “underwriters” in this context and need to find another exemption on which to rely. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
In Stevens v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am
Luckily, the CJEU was poised to answer this question in a case that was decided last month.The case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb GmbH v Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co KG concerned the sale of medical dressings made by Lohmann, sold under the brand "Debrisoft" (TM No. 8852279). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am
Luckily, the CJEU was poised to answer this question in a case that was decided last month.The case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb GmbH v Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co KG concerned the sale of medical dressings made by Lohmann, sold under the brand "Debrisoft" (TM No. 8852279). [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:18 am
Nevertheless, as in a 1993 case (Sale v. [read post]
