Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 5,863
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2010, 12:14 pm
(picture, left - Justice Kennedy) The test was whether the invention produced a "useful, concrete and tangible result"(State Street Bank & Trust Co v Signature Financial Group (1998) ). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm
S. 825 and Dolan v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am
Briefly: At Concurring Opinions, Robert Schapiro comments on the potential implications that the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:17 am
In Fulton v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:50 am
In eBay v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm
” Wired reports on Bowman v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
Justice Ginsburg, joined by Justice Sotomayor, wrote a dissent, stating that the ruling should have been in favor of the same-sex couple. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:55 am
Let’s talk about Zivotofsky v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 5:37 pm
Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:54 am
That is the question before the justices on Wednesday morning, in Lynch v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:36 pm
Earlier today, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Tyler v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
The case is the most significant elections matter the justices have been forced to confront since the Bush v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 4:52 am
State, 19 N.W.2d 529 (Wis. 1945). [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am
Mass. 1997)(occupational epidemiology of benzene exposure and benzene does not inform health effects from vanishingly low exposure to benzene in bottled water) Whiting v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:34 am
Breyer wrote for the dissenters, including Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:14 am
In Abood v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
Stevens and United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:27 am
(Lynch v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
In Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:56 pm
Justice Sotomayor pressed lawyers for the state to show which specific statute contains the text that clearly demonstrates congressional intent to disestablish the Creek Reservation. [read post]
