Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 8,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2013, 2:23 pm
The People assert that the Board erred in not assessing defendant 20 points under Factor 7, Relationship with Victims. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:57 am
The deposition of the physician who took the plaintiff’s blood pressure on March 9 does not help the plaintiff’s case. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am
Id. at 19-20. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:13 am
But at the same time, I think it must be conceded that the vast majority of the defendants had likely committed a tort. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
§§ 921(a)(20)(B) and 922(g)(1); and (2) whether an individual may be barred from exercising Second Amendment rights upon conviction of a non-aggravated common law misdemeanor. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
We believe that it does.")), or to apply them (Scott v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
(D.N.J. 8/20/13) provides further legal justification for employers to avoid this practice. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
(D.N.J. 8/20/13) provides further legal justification for employers to avoid this practice. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am
There are only two acceptable justifications for an on-site demand, the Court ruled: (1) “probable cause,” meaning specific evidence of an existing violation of the law; or (2) a neutral selection plan. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 10:09 am
(Ilya Somin) Co-blogger Nita Farahany takes issue with “many parts” of my post defending the morality of designer babies against claims that they would lead to unjust inequality. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:50 pm
Watts, Inc., 1:05-cv-867-JDT-TAB, 2006 U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
§ 77m, does not require plaintiffs asserting a claim under the 1933 Act to plead with particularity compliance with the statute of limitations. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:14 am
Does the phrase “scratching the surface” seem like a fair one? [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
What does that last part mean? [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:03 pm
Although defendants have not expressly cited CPLR 3211 (a) (1) as the basis for their motion, they are relying on certain documents as being dispositive plaintiff's claims as well. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
He testified that he did not rely on [defendant’s] warnings. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:35 pm
The administrative order provides for the referral of cases into the Misdemeanor Veterans Treatment Court.If a defendant appears for arraignment or disposition on eligible charges, and appears to be a veteran eligible for the Veterans Court, the defendant will be given a new disposition date within the originating division within 20 days. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:35 pm
Hilaire, Attorney & Counselor at Law, PLLC, 20 W. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 3:37 pm
Defendant was released from prison on March 1, 1996. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 1:50 pm
The contract should provide access to necessary information including all records necessary to monitor and defend the plan, its design and administration, its compliance and prudent administration, including all disclosure, audit and reporting requirements. [read post]
