Search for: "Does 1 - 23"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 15,479
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2019, 2:00 am
Despite California’s legalization of both medical and recreational marijuana, California law does not protect marijuana users from employment-based decisions. [read post]
22 May 2011, 11:20 pm
Oddly, Art.10(a) of the EIA Directive does not get a mention in the judgement. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:46 am
” Id. at 118, 122-23. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 4:55 pm
A New York Criminal Lawyer said the defendant was indicted by a Nassau County Grand Jury on September 23, 1985, charged with Grand Larceny, Second Degree. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 11:31 am
Penn Paper at 1. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
The appellant subsequently appealed to the Supreme Court under section 37.Issues: (1) Is an award deciding the issue of limitation an interim award; (2) can such interim award be directly set aside under section 34 or does it relate to jurisdiction, in which case the procedure under section 16 is required to be followed? [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 4:59 pm
” However, the law does not define what that means. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
Ed. 2d 1, 113 S. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
Here are a few points to remember. 1. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 4:38 pm
Thus, while the notice is effective on July 23, 2008, this notice does not excuse or otherwise affect the legal consequence of a failure to comply with existing law or regulations that occurred prior to July 23, 2008. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 3:52 am
The relation back doctrine cannot apply in an FLSA collective action because a Rule 23 class has independent legal status, whereas an FLSA collective class does not. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:08 pm
Furthermore, PPACA places immediate limits on expansion of operating rooms, beds and procedure rooms, limits aggregate increases in physician ownership as of March 23, 2010, and imposes certain disclosure requirements on existing physician-owned hospitals. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
¶¶16-17, 22-23. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:31 pm
Any of the parties who does so violates the terms of that contract…. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 7:35 am
Torres (1/23/2020) This is one of only two Arizona Supreme Court cases reported here. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:29 am
Trump, Case No.: 1:23-cv-03773 (civil removal proceedings) Trump notice of appeal to 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals (July 28, 2023) Order and opinion denying Trump motion to remove and granting State of New York motion to remand (July 19, 2023) Order regulating removal evidentiary hearing (June 23, 2023) State of New York memorandum of law in support of its reply in support of its motion to remand (June 23, 2023) Joint letter in agreement on procedures and evidence… [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
In certifying representatives for a damage class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) and an injunctive relief class under Rule 23(b)(2), Judge Cogan made three key rulings: (1) the “own and control” exemption to the ban on indirect-purchaser damage claims under the rule of Illinois Brick v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 1:00 am
The appeal will consider three points: (1) Does a child named as a dependent on a parent’s asylum application have any protection from refoulement? [read post]
31 May 2007, 6:16 am
The class action complaint included causes of action for a class action claim under FRCP Rule 23(b)(3) “for violation of state wage and hour laws ‘in each state in which each [p]laintiff worked’ (Count 4),” as well as “a class action claim under [FRCP Rule 23(b)(1)] for violation of state wage and hour laws ‘of the various states in which [p]laintiffs worked’ (Count 5). [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 9:53 am
" [46] [1] U.S. [read post]
