Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 9,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
The endorphins were flowing over at Octane Fitness last week when the Court granted cert. on its question regarding what constitutes an “exceptional case” under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:10 am
§ 112 ¶ 1 … [since] the specification simply does not disclose [the claimed] invention." [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 9:30 pm
But it does not have a zero tolerance policy for Salmonella, unlike E. coli O157:H7 (and six others), which is/are the deadliest food borne pathogens. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 12:06 am
*10%25%35%40%9. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:06 am
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17–18 (1966). [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:02 am
Therefore, we will sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-21 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:30 am
Perhaps when you eat millet and shit in a trench and die at 35 your bar for exoticism is set pretty low. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 11:42 am
The complaint does not provide the amount of damages suffered, but will seek to treble the damages once established per 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
§112, ¶1. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 7:15 am
Id. at **34-35. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:35 pm
That's the question in The Board of Education of Roxana Community Unit School District No. 1 v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 3:25 pm
Anyway: (1) Modern Orthodox Judaism is a failure. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:35 pm
Representative Claim"1. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 8:58 am
As the Hatch-Waxman Act allows Sunovion to do, they then initiated a patent infringement lawsuit, asserting that Reddy’s ANDA submission constituted an act of infringement of claims 1, 2, and 8 of the ’673 patent according to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:15 am
Within this framework, a party's status actually does make some difference for fee-shifting. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
Fla 2013) http://t.co/dIDKE48ix2 -> Artists claim compensation from Innwa Bank over copyright infringement – Eleven Myanmar http://t.co/HNKTmG2sBZ -> LinkedIn users claim company 'hacked' their e-mail accounts http://t.co/dtA3j6Jg5S -> Google’s Fallacious Piracy Self-Study (Part 1) http://t.co/96nfnxZR8v -> Syria Issues New Copyright and Related Rights Law http://t.co/Z42jb3PndY -> After NSA revelations, a privacy czar is needed http://t.co/WUDVcKs3hg ->… [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 5:16 pm
For instance, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:47 am
’673patent col. 1 ll. 24–35. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:15 am
I have not parsed through the new provision to see if it does what they say it does: 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:05 am
Section 512(c)(1)(A) protects a service provider who: does not have “actual knowledge” of the infringing material or activity using the material;7 in the absence of such knowledge, “is not aware of facts or circumstances from which the infringing activity is apparent,”;8 or upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove, or disable access, to the material.9 In addition to the knowledge-based framework above, § 512(c) states… [read post]
