Search for: "Matter of Novel" Results 5501 - 5520 of 7,159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2011, 8:34 am by Steve Vladeck
Below the fold, I try to explain both why the changes matter, and why, in my view, they make this opinion that much more indefensible. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In section 2.3 an objection of lack of inventive step is raised (A 56), based on the object to be achieved by the invention, as seen by the ED.[5] With its appeal the [applicant] filed amended claims requests and supplied the statement of grounds of appeal in respect of novelty and inventive step of the subject-matter of claim 1 of each of these requests.[6] In its communication the Board observed that the appeal appeared to concern only the issues of novelty and inventive step in respect… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 6:40 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In passing, 35 USC 103(b) states:(b)(1) Notwithstanding subsection (a), and upon timely election by the applicant for patent to proceed under this subsection, a biotechnological process using or resulting in a composition of matter that is novel under section 102 and nonobvious under subsection (a) of this section shall be considered nonobvious if-(A) claims to the process and the composition of matter are contained in either the same application for patent or in separate… [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:53 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Those might have factored in his decision to ask the police not to pursue the matter. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 2:47 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
**IPBiz notes that Coskata is also involved in synthesis gas matters. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:56 pm
The Massachusetts Attorney General tried to change that law in a novel criminal indictment a few years ago. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:15 am by Maxwell Kennerly
The teams thus can’t, as a legal matter, set up a “contract, combination in the form of a trust or otherwise, or, conspiracy, in restraint of trade” as prohibited by § 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 11:37 pm by Josh Blackman
Chicago (analysis here and here) that cuts to the core of this novel jurisprudence. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:56 am by Max Kennerly
They had to fight on every front, get every issue out, no matter how ugly the performance, no matter disappointing the prose. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:44 am by Lovechilde
It doesn’t matter whether you compare high-school dropouts or workers with graduate degrees, whites are still more likely to have a job than blacks. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:21 pm by Albert Wan
 It matters not then that Strickland would eventually be applied to potentially novel factual circumstances. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:48 am by John Richards
These games, no matter how violent they are, do not rise to the level of obscenity. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
  His opinion garnered only the support of Roberts, however, and Scalia, writing for the majority, flatly rejected the law, in an opinion so broad it leaves no likelihood of survival for any such law, no matter how well-written. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 5:33 am by Benjamin Wittes
Their use raises some novel issues, but in many ways, those issues are more the logical extension of the issues raised by previous weapons technologies than departures from them. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:35 am by Adam Wagner
The contention that a State’s armed forces, by reason of their personal status, fall within the jurisdiction of the State for the purposes of article 1 is novel. [read post]