Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 5501 - 5520 of 41,388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2017, 2:11 pm
  “Such access permits checks against the arbitrary exercise of official power and secrecy in the political process. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am by Andrew Crank, Olswang LLP
The Court of Appeal relied on Article 46(1)-(3) which states, at Article 46(2)(b), that the power to grant an external restraint order must be exercised “with a view to securing that there is no diminution in the value of the property identified in the external request”. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 9:52 am by Jack Goldsmith
And in any event, OLC has often ruled, in reliance on United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 11:44 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Nikos Lavranos & Ahmed Mazlom, The Investment Treaty Implications of Covid-19 Responses by States Ronan O’Reilly, EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment – A Rebalancing of Investment Relations Lawrence Northmore-Ball, Jennifer Harvey, & Amber Courtier, Micula v Romania – A Saga of Lasting Significance Ondřej Svoboda, UNCITRAL Working Group III and Multilateral Investment Court – Troubled Waters for EU Normative… [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:45 pm by National Indian Law Library
Courts of Appeals Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/currentcta.htmCases featured:United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:24 am
The justices hold that the ALJs ARE "officers of the United States" for purposes of the Appointments Clause.AND: Another case is Pereira v. [read post]