Search for: "Shields v. Shields" Results 5501 - 5520 of 6,258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2008, 10:13 am
[MO] (introduced 2/13/2008)Complete Bill InformationComments:As to those convicted prior to the enactment of AWA, and whose circumstances occurred before the enactment of AWA (or the retroactive application by the USAG), this bill clearly violates the ex post facto clauses, if AWA punishes them for acts occurring beforehand.CALDER v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
By Mike Dorf In a very interesting opinion last week in Byrd v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 7:06 am by Drew York
The Texas Supreme Court, in the narrowly decided case of Harris County Flood Control District and Harris County v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 2:33 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Renowned legal scholars denounced the ruling, contending that it invalidated the legal protections originally intended in the letter of Law 54, to shield a victim from an act of violence, in this case inflicted by her partner. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 12:58 am by Moshe (Thomas A.) Sharon, R.N., M.P.H.
The Future Directions Committee can Save the Day In April of 2010, Harvey V. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:03 am by Lyle Denniston
This marked the first time that a federal appeals court had rejected a claim that the Supreme Court’s ruling last June in the case of Burwell v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 5:33 am by Michael Geist
  Meanwhile, the rhetoric now features an attempt to re-interpret the Supreme Court’s 2021 Access Copyright v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
And I’d get a day off from blogging if this one were that straightforward Plaintiff gets framed by a co-worker These facts set the stage for the Second Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Vasquez v. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 3:09 pm by Francis Pileggi
The Court of Chancery recently barred a Scientific Games Corp. investor from suing ex-Chairman Ron Perelman and his “hand-picked” directors in Delaware because the plaintiff couldn’t prove it was tricked into approving a mandatory forum selection bylaw requiring all corporate governance charges to be tried in Nevada where officers and directors would allegedly be shielded, in Sylebra Capital Partners Master Fund Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 3:40 pm by Robert Liles
  Case Example Where the Government Sought to Pierce the Corporate Veil of a Home Health Agency: In United States v. [read post]