Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 5501 - 5520 of 10,139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2014, 5:10 am by SHG
  Used on a pro se criminal defendant in a court in the United States of America? [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:41 am by Jani
This has not been left out in the discussions of this blog, where copyright reform has been quite extensively covered in Ireland, Australia and the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:16 pm by Paul M. Secunda
Last month I commenced a series of posts of the United States Supreme Court’s labor and employment law decisions last term by blogging on the Court’s decision in the First Amendment public employee free speech case of Lane v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:47 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Although the average course on civics or government thoroughly reviews the provisions of the United States Constitution, many overlook the importance of state constitutions as sources of important rights. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:10 pm by Kevin Askew
Porsche, the Second Circuit limited the extraterritorial reach of the U.S. securities laws, affirming the dismissal of securities claims brought by parties to swap agreements that were entered into in the United States but were based on the price of foreign securities. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 1:54 pm by Bill Otis
 At no point has the United States ever executed more than a tiny fraction of one percent of its murderers. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:32 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  The short story is that the state court judge disagreed with the tribal court judge and retained jurisdiction over the second case. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
We, therefore, order the United States to release Medina–Lara from custody immediately. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
• Since there was no New Zealand authority on non-literal copyright infringement it was germane to consider English and United States authorities on non-literal software copyright infringement. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:39 pm by Nikki Siesel
The Respondent Admitted that he wasn’t using the mark MYUNDIES with the clothing items specified in his application on the date he filed it with the United States Patent & Trademark Office. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:21 am by Timothy P. Flynn
"  Professor Mortenson asserted that the couple was properly married following Judge Friedman's ruling and that status cannot be undone, even if the SCOTUS reinstates Michigan's constitutional ban on gay marriage.Ever since the 5-4 SCOTUS ruling in United States v Windsor in 2012, same-sex marriage advocates and the ACLU have argued in lower courts across the nation that the case applies to states' power to ban same-sex marriage; the… [read post]