Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 5501 - 5520
of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2024, 11:35 am
Parts II through V then consider in detail the text and interpretation of the substantive provisions of the UNGP. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:02 am
In Beck v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Blood Ctr., 213 F.R.D. 108, 112 (E.D.N.Y. 2003) (hepatitis B); Doe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:38 am
Through the reasoning he offers in Parts III-B and III-C, Chief Justice Roberts come to the conclusion that the requirement of the ACA that an individual who does not have health insurance must pay a penalty to the IRS can be viewed as a tax.The Plurality on the Tax IssueFive judges agree that the 'individual mandate' is a constitutionally valid exercise of taxing powers and that agreement is at the heart of the court's decision to uphold the… [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 1:59 pm
In the recent CBC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm
At first instance, Mr Justice Collins dismissed TTM’s claim holding that his detention had not been unlawful until such time as the court declared the decision-making process to have been defective – applying R v Managers of South Western Hospital ex p M [1993] QB 683 and R v Central London County Court ex p London [1999] QB 1260 and distinguishing Re S-C (Mental Patient Habeas Corpus) [1996] QB 599 as it was not directly concerned with that… [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 10:34 am
By Glen C. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 3:03 am
It's 2.7 million for the feds, 3.7 million for the states, and 10.9 million for local governments. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 10:01 pm
" In L.L. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
., LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
On January 1, 2024, Peter Pan will finally enter the public domain in the United States—but not in Barrie’s native United Kingdom. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:07 pm
S. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 8:06 am
(Accord Gemsco, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 8:15 am
Fraternity Collection, LLC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 9:03 am
All claims arising out of (a) a riot or insurrection, (b) a civil disturbance resulting in an official proclamation of a state of emergency, (c) a temporary curfew, or (d) martial law are agreed to constitute one ‘occurrence. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Addressing Smith's constitutional challenge to 4 NYCRR 5.3(c), the Appellate Division rejected Smith� [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Addressing Smith's constitutional challenge to 4 NYCRR 5.3(c), the Appellate Division rejected Smith� [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Addressing Smith's constitutional challenge to 4 NYCRR 5.3(c), the Appellate Division rejected Smith� [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Addressing Smith's constitutional challenge to 4 NYCRR 5.3(c), the Appellate Division rejected Smith� [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
P. 23(b)(2) requirements for certification; and 4) remand was necessary for consideration of whether the proposed damages class met the Rule 23(b)(3) requirements. [read post]
