Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 5501 - 5520 of 15,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2017, 9:25 am by Vanessa Sauter
The proclamation does include a number of exceptions to this expanded ban, notably for dual nationality, diplomacy, and asylum:  (b)  Exceptions. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am by Dan Carvajal
Taxes on machinery and equipment create an incentive for mobile capital to flow to other states, which has increasingly led states to place tangible personal property taxes on the chopping block.[14] Property taxes (both real and personal) are often subject to what is known as an assessment ratio, which specifies the percentage of the property’s value subject to the tax millage. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
L107, s. 20(3) [“Legal Profession Act”]; Quebec: An Act respecting the Barreau de Québec, CQLR c B-1, s. 128 [“Act respecting Barreau de Quebec”]. [4] Ontario: Law Society Act, ibid, ss. 26.2 & 26.3; Manitoba; Legal Profession Act, s. 28(3); Quebec: Act respecting Barreau de Quebec, s. 140. [5] Law Society of Upper Canada, 2016 Annual Report (Professional Regulation Division) at 36, online:… [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
WEINSTEIN, PINSON & RILEY, P.S., EVAN MOSCOV, and EGS FINANCIAL CARE, INC., formerly known as NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants.No. 14 C 739.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm by Matthew Kahn
(e)  The Department of Homeland Security evaluated each country against the baseline described in subsection (c) of this section. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Now before the United States Supreme Court and supported by anti-LGBTQ groups, and the United States Department of Justice, the bakery argues that it has a First Amendment right to discriminate based on the owner’s religious beliefs. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
Bloomberg BNA’s Cases and Controversies podcast features a discussion of Epic Systems v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 8:27 pm by Jon Katz
Commonwealth, 34 Va.App. 74, 81, 538 S.E.2d 316, 319 (2000) (where owner of bag opened bag for officer after officer (a) unlawfully seized it, (b) asked owner whether it contained contraband, (c) received response that bag contained knife, and (d) stated that ‘she needed to see [knife],’ Commonwealth showed “ ‘mere submission to a claim of lawful authority’ ” rather than consent to search that was “ ‘freely and voluntarily… [read post]