Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 5,863
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:04 am
In Escobar v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:25 am
Breyer, and Sonia Sotomayor grounded the holding exclusively on domestic law. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:56 am
United States, 31 Fed. [read post]
24 May 2018, 7:03 am
You would have had to wait until 1967, in Katz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
In Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
‘Dear White Staffers’: Anonymous testimonials about workplace culture grip Capitol Hill MSN – Mariana Sotomayor (Washington Post) | Published: 2/4/2022 Concerns about low pay, hostile work environments, and racial and gender discrimination have gripped Capitol Hill as an Instagram account called “Dear White Students” has posted hundreds of testimonials from current and former aides that tell a dispiriting story about what it is like to work in the halls… [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am
Castro-Huerta, which was joined by Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. 142 S.Ct. 2486, 2506-07 (2022). [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:42 am
” Finally, David Kopel argues in the Washington Times that Justice Sotomayor’s recent dissent in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 10:53 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor echoed Ginsburg’s concern. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
HHS argued that the RFRA was intended to restore the state of the law as it existed before Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990). [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
The first time, it was a death penalty case. a death penalty case, State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 7:26 am
On July 1, the Court decided Moody v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 4:57 pm
Note that this would be a case that Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor would allow to go forward under the ATS. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:15 am
Although the case, Fisher v University of Texas at Austin (Dkt. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:28 pm
“My God, that sounds like it’s using race more rather than less than this plan does,” remarked Justice Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
Hyatt ; Janus v. [read post]
