Search for: "Styles v. State"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 5,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am
It would be easy to frame this issue in classic policy terms of government regulation v. the marketplace. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:54 am
With regard to the concerns of the SPAB [16] to [21], the Chancellor stated: “[22]. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:51 am
Sen. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
” That title succinctly states the insult. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:38 pm
-style fair use provision and those opposed to new exception categories altogether. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am
It would be easy to frame this issue in classic policy terms of government regulation v. the marketplace. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
D4b also discloses that it is preferred, in order to achieve the objective of D4b with respect to sleekness of hair and styling ease, that the pH measured at 25°C of the cosmetic solution diluted 20-fold in water is in a range of from 2.5 to 4.5, more preferably in a range of from 3 to 4.2 […], i.e. within the pH range defined in claim 1 of the present request. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 5:50 am
Ed Walters from v has been on the show multiple times, so welcome back, Ed, Ed Walters 0:30 Thanks, Greg, here. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:20 am
Uncertainty makes it v. difficult for nonprofits to provide a robust environment that we all depend on. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:58 am
I live-tweeted about the Google v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:44 am
In the coordinated California state court talc cases, Judge Maren E. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
In a scathing decision in Abdulaali v Salih, he stated, 1. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:18 am
That sounds almost exactly like the claim made against the defendants in the Bone Screw litigation – and which, when presented as a state-law claim, was unanimously held preempted in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 11:01 pm
(Full disclosure: I am an investigator for the Colorado State Public Defender.) [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Chubin, et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:18 pm
This segment summarizes state-of-the art knowledge of the pros and cons (advantages and limitations) of using ionizing radiation to enhance the quality of fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
First, it’s ridiculous to call the Castle Rock v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
Let's look at updates state by state, and then turn to last Thursday's big development in Los Angeles. [read post]
