Search for: "AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTION " Results 5521 - 5540 of 8,662
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), came down, we were relieved and grateful. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Americans for Safe Access, contended that the Drug Enforcement Administration had a legal duty to review medical evidence and reclassify marijuana. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Americans for Safe Access, contended that the Drug Enforcement Administration had a legal duty to review medical evidence and reclassify marijuana. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:50 am by Schachtman
Cir.Ct., Civil Action No. 00-C-1180H, Amended Order Denying Class Certification (Dec. 12, 2001) (Hutchison, J.), 2001 WL 1818442 (Dec 13, 2001). [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Judge Gorsuch wrote that the “administrative state” that has resulted from Chevron deference runs contrary to the principle of separation of powers. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Kavanaugh considers himself to be a principled originalist (much more even than Kennedy), and the originalist case against all race-conscious affirmative action under the Fourteenth Amendment seems dubious. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Judge Gorsuch wrote that the “administrative state” that has resulted from Chevron deference runs contrary to the principle of separation of powers. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:22 pm by Ilya Somin
Indeed, as the Supreme Court recognized in the 2015 Horne case, the Takings Clause was inspired in the first place in part by revulsion at both British and American forces' seizure of property during the colonial era and the Revolutionary War. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:26 am by Larry Johnson
Glennon in his post warned American policy-makers to be wary of a “time bomb” that could explode in May – the adoption of a vague, new crime of aggression that could have broad application to U.S. leaders. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:33 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
It mirrors the “reprehensibility” factor described by the United States Supreme Court in BMW of North American, Inc. v. [read post]
New York in which he made clear that the most effective way to prevent “arbitrary and unreasonable” government action is to require that the burdens imposed on minorities must be imposed on the majority as well. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:52 am by Expert Witness Guru
This argument was based on similarities being drawn with the American Honda case. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 10:03 pm by davidmginsberg
  The phrase “religious differences” can be incredibly divisive and diverse, as Americans learned after its incursion into Iraq. [read post]
The pandemic shined a harsh light on what was already a growing recognition that American courts, particularly state ones, are in the throes of an access-to-justice crisis. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:59 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
We interpret arbitration agreements under traditional contract principles. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 5:50 pm
* New Jersey's enforcement action against JuicyCampus. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Gurbir Grewal
An animating principle for any regulator is that government belongs to, and must work for, all of the people. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Guest Author
  In his recent book, Vermeule suggests that the American doctrine of administrative law is shot through with moral principles, including deference.[8] Whether this is true is beside the point. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
In principle, I strongly welcome the debate that has been stimulated by both the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative and the Pen / Index on Censorship Report. [read post]