Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 15,557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2015, 1:43 pm
State v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Lawyers and judges weave the fabric or map the landscape—meaning, they articulate the underlying principles and figure out how different pieces or sources of law fit with each other. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 1:06 pm
Peak Health Center v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
” He seemed to be searching for a broad-based solution by closing the courthouse doors so judges wouldn’t have to “give each one of them a separate trial” if they chose to leave the country.In Chae Chan Ping v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:22 am
Further, since both marks were word marks, the Board's references to case-law were irrelevant to the extent that they dealt with the increased likelihood of confusion when marks that included figurative elements which were likely to differentiate them were reproduced without those figurative elements on menus used in cafes, bars or restaurants.* Given the low degree of visual and phonetic similarity of the signs and their conceptual differences, even the fact that the marks… [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:25 am
GREATER OMAHA DecisionCAFC Renders Split Decision in CORN THINS and RICE THINS Appeal: Affirming Mere Descriptiveness But Remanding on GenericnessOther: TTAB Schedules Eleven (11) Oral Hearings for January 2019TTAB Posts December 2018 Hearing ScheduleTTAB Posts November 2018 Hearing ScheduleDoes a Law School Professor Have Standing to Oppose RAPUNZEL for Dolls and Toy Figures? [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:03 am
The committee typically reviews takeovers and mergers after they occur, but several committee members have argued that the “boardroom battle itself” in Qualcomm v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:38 am
A couple of readers have asked where this figure comes from. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:25 am
History plays a role: SCt has gone back to historical sources for patent law, e.g., Impressions v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 8:14 am
Messier v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:23 am
She cited Crawford v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
The Second Circuit recently addressed these issues in Dongguk University v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:00 am
Whilst it had been submitted by opposing counsel that Wenman may have exaggerated this figure, HHJ Clarke went so far as to suggest that even if only 5% or 1% of her work was attributable to Archangel Alchemy (though HHJ Clarke considered on the evidence that it was more than that), this would be more than trivial and would have generated sufficient actual goodwill to be capable of damage by reason of a misrepresentation.HHJ Clarke dismissed claims that ‘The Archangel Alchemist’… [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 10:18 am
Spencer v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:22 pm
Brands’ “highly readable take on the clash of two titanic figures in a period of hair-trigger nuclear tensions. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:12 am
Unlike word or figurative marks, the relevant public is not (yet) used to recognizing sounds as a reference to a specific company. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 3:23 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
Last week Advocate General Mengozzi gave his Opinion in Case C-20/14 BGW Marketing - & Management- Service GmbH v Bodo Scholz [available so far in 17 EU official languages, but not English, notes Merpel] on the interpretation of Article 4(1)(b) of Directive 2008/95, following a request by the Bundespatentgericht (German Federal Patent Court) to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling.The underlying dispute concerned an… [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:47 am
Orin Kerr argued that Microsoft should have challenged the All Writs Act instead of the Stored Communications Act in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 9:41 am
Yes, indeed, it's time to take a look at Colloseum Holding AG v Levi Strauss & Co.Mark 6 So what's this case about? [read post]
