Search for: "Levell v. State" Results 5521 - 5540 of 29,869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2024, 3:35 am
But it seems fair enough to let the people decide whether they want a constitutional right, at the state level, that gives them back approximately what they had under the Supreme Court case law before the overruling of Roe v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Eric Goldman
This case reminds us that we still have cleanup work to do at the state level to fix antiquated dilution statutes; or better yet, rulings like this should prompt us to reconsider if and when we really need dilution laws at all. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 11:25 am by Jeff Gamso
  We're talking now about the Ohio Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
  This was going against the grain of one of the stated purposes behind the reforms to the law of defamation: to reduce, rather than increase, costs. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
  This was going against the grain of one of the stated purposes behind the reforms to the law of defamation: to reduce, rather than increase, costs. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
  This was going against the grain of one of the stated purposes behind the reforms to the law of defamation: to reduce, rather than increase, costs. [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:43 am by Lyle Denniston
  The issue has divided lower federal and state courts, and the case of King v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 8:05 am by Ilya Somin
Whatever else can be said of state-level marijuana legalization, it greatly reduces marijuana-related arrests and incarceration. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 2:28 am by Jani
"What was asked effectively boils down to where the content lies, and whether jurisdiction lies within that country of origin (in the case the top-level domain, for example .co.uk) or in every Member State to which the content is directed. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 9:15 am
  The Superintendent and Attorney General also alleged that the then current level of disclosure did not properly inform clients of the compensation to be received. [read post]