Search for: "Municipal Court" Results 5521 - 5540 of 17,043
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2017, 8:46 am by Jeff Rasansky
”  Impersonating a Police Officer [HB 683] The law previously stated that it was illegal to be in possession of or use law enforcement insignia, or a vehicle, in a municipality of at least 1.18 million residents. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 7:27 am by Zachary Price
Four years earlier, the Supreme Court had floated this “equal sovereignty” idea in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:13 am by John Jascob
Imperato's other arguments, based on due process and the statute of limitations were also without merit.The court went on to grant the SEC’s request to vacate the portion of the Commission's order barring Imperato from association with municipal advisors and NRSROs. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 3:10 am by John Marshall
Most cases involve a disorderly persons offense for possession of 50 grams or less of marijuana falling under municipal court jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:43 am by David Webster
The Forms Center is now organized by Division (Trial, Family, Orphans', Municipal, etc.) and then by subject matter.For example, pick Family Division, Domestic Relations and then Custody to see all 16 custody forms available from the Court. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 5:00 am by eileen peck
Some analysts believe that municipal restrictions on sex offender housing may be a barrier to housing, despite the law. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
This legal challenge comes two decades after courts recognized women’s right to bare their breasts in public in Ontario. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Woodberry, 2017-Ohio-6968, which relates to a landlord-tenant case appealed from the Hamilton County Municipal Court. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Woodberry, 2017-Ohio-6968, which relates to a landlord-tenant case appealed from the Hamilton County Municipal Court. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Because a fiscal plan certified by the oversight board is conclusive and nonreviewable, a Title III court is likely to accord great deference to the oversight board’s determination that a specific PPP satisfies this “economic growth” requirement, and absent a successful challenge to PROMESA itself, would by its terms lack authority to hear any dispute regarding such determination.[6] Thus, if a certified fiscal plan prioritizes PPP transactions as part of a Title III plan… [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:53 am by Matthew Reisig
Bukowski, 47, was charged with DWI and careless driving, and is awaiting his case to be heard in Westfield Municipal Court. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:53 am by Matthew Reisig
Bukowski, 47, was charged with DWI and careless driving, and is awaiting his case to be heard in Westfield Municipal Court. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:29 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Tennessee Supreme Court disbarred an attorney who had previously been disbarred for misappropriation. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 6:14 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court decision, the latest in a series eviscerating major parts of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, the employer discontinued Petitioner's §207-c leave status.The Appellate Division said it agreed with Petitioner's employer that the Hearing Officer's determination that Petitioner could continue to perform the light duties to which he was assigned was supported by substantial evidence.The court said that although Petitioner presented evidence suggesting that he was not able to work at all, "the Hearing Officer instead credited other evidence that… [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:40 pm by Matthew Reisig
Most were fined $200 with a $33 charge for court costs, but several were fined $406 with the $33 court cost charge. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 2:28 am by Jeremy Saland
Obviously, based on the title of this blog you can likely take an educated guess and figure out that despite what was lacking, the court found the complaint (at this point called an “information”) legally sufficient. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:15 am
And as the Supreme Court recently reminded us, the government violates the First Amendment when it allows only “happy-talk. [read post]