Search for: "OR Specific, Inc." Results 5521 - 5540 of 37,647
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2021, 6:10 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
It based this rule on the Ellerth/Faragher analysis, named after two Supreme Court rulings from 1998, Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 10:19 am by Russell Knight
S & S Roof Maintenance, Inc., 146 Ill. 2d 263, 273 (1992) “The [proposed amender] must meet all four factors” I.C.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:35 am by Joseph M. Hallman
” The Federal Circuit wrote that this discrepancy between the specification and the claims highlights that “the focus of the claimed advance is the abstract idea and not the particular configuration discussed in the specification that allegedly departs from the prior art. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm by Matt Murphy
Specifically, “the system design did not include a consideration for jaywalking pedestrians.[8]” At 1.2 seconds before the collision, the system identified Herzberg as a bicycle moving into the path of the Uber but it was too late to brake or avoid a collision. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 11:41 am by Matt Murphy
The Guides specifically define every “impairment” (including Class 1) as “[a] significant deviation, loss, or loss of uses of any body structure or function in an individual…” and the Court cites this definition.[7] By definition, all impairments are “significant. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 9:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Zillow survived an appeal by Corus at the CAFC: Appellant appeals a decision of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington granting Zillow Group, Inc. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As we have documented elsewhere, since the Supreme Court’s early 2018 decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]