Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 19,219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2018, 5:54 pm
” (citations andinternal quotation marks omitted) (second alteration inoriginal)). [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:12 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 12:20 pm
State ex rel. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:24 pm
In effect, the Proposed Regulations say they are reversing the resultin United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 6:28 am
Quinn, of Harris v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:16 pm
The Lessons of the Supreme Court's Ruling in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:31 am
By: Michael Jacobsen Seyfarth Synopsis: As reported here, to mark the two-year anniversary of TransUnion LLC v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
In its Judgment in Case C-235/09 DHL Express France SAS v Chronopost SA the European Court of Justice ruled that the Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community Trade Mark (the Regulation) creates Community arrangements for trademarks whereby undertakings may obtain Community trademarks to which uniform protection is given and which produce their effects throughout the entire area of the European Union. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 12:19 pm
General Motors LLC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:13 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:40 am
This question is now before the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Dareskizb v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 2:30 pm
Plantronics,Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 9:19 pm
* JUMPSTAR goes to court as DOBBIN covers a case of batteryAn electrifying story about trade marks for battery adaptors and chargers comes from the UK IP Enterprise Court, Data Marketing and & Secretarial Ltd and Winning Deals Ltd v S & S Enterprises Ltd and Selective Marketplace Ltd [2014] EWHC 1499 (IPEC). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:03 am
Blank Rome also fails to state a cause of action for contractual indemnification since "[a] party is entitled to full contractual indemnification provided that the intention to indemnify can be clearly implied from the language and purposes of the entire agreement and the surrounding facts and circumstances" (Drzewinski v Atlantic Scaffold & Ladder Co., 70 NY2d 774, 777 [1987] [internal quotation marks omitted]; Masciotta v Morse Diesel Intl., Inc.,… [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 10:30 am
The TMA clears the path for legitimate businesses to register their marks by cleaning out the federal trademark register and giving the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) the ability to expedite the registration process. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:11 am
Facts: This case (Zavislak v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 3:19 am
Morningware, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 1:48 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments yesterday in the case of State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:34 am
Multilateralism v Bilateralism: What’s in it for international IP regulation? [read post]
