Search for: "State v. Richard" Results 5521 - 5540 of 8,045
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm by John Elwood
Next up is yet another state-on-top habeas case, Howes v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 11:42 am by David Walk
The Eleventh Circuit just issued a very interesting recent decision on this topic in Roe v. [read post]
6 May 2017, 12:00 am by Robert L. Mues
Kentucky took a step closer on April 12, 2017 to making shared parenting in instances of divorce the norm in the state. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm by Jeff Gamso
 That voters approved Proposition 8 denying same-sex couples the right to marry, Judge Walker said, is irrelevant sincefundamental rights may not be submitted to [a] vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.That's a quote from the Supreme Court's 1943 decision in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Sir Richard Doll was ahead of Selikoff by a decade in reporting the epidemiologic association between asbestosis and lung cancer.[3] Christopher Wagner was ahead of Selikoff by several years in describing the association between amphibole asbestos and mesothelioma[4]. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 1:18 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there was a directions hearing before Richard Spearman KC in the defamation case of Kirkegaard v Smith QB-2018-000390 and an application for default judgment in the defamation case of BPP Holdings Limited and ot [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:00 pm by John Dean
Also, it is not clear to me if Judge Kavanaugh does or does not believe U.S. v Nixon (the 8-0 holding that ended Nixon’s presidency, forcing him to provide prosecutors incriminating secretly recorded conversations) was correctly decided.My second general point is a very important process matter. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am by Guest Blogger
  Like Joseph Story in his 1842 decision in Prigg v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
Cooper was ready with a precedent of his own, the Court’s 1982 decision in Crawford v. [read post]