Search for: "Thomas v. State"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 15,508
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2013, 9:05 pm
Department of Labor v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:50 pm
United States Docket Filing | Questions Presented Case Number: 07-10441 On Appeal From: USCA-3 Date Argued: January 21, 2009 Date Decided: April 6, 2009 5-4; Vacated and Remanded Majority: Souter(m), Stevens, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer Dissent: Alito(d), Roberts, Scalia, Thomas Days between argument and opinion: 75 (42) United States v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:25 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court issued its ruling in North Carolina Department of Corrections v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 8:55 am
More on Batson v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:47 am
As many of you no doubt have heard, the United States Supreme Court last week decided that FDA regulations applicable to generic drug manufacturers preempt state law "failure to warn" claims in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm
United States cases and its more recent plurality opinion in Chavez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm
Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 8:22 am
 The issue in Barber, et al., v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:52 am
Supreme Court held today in Buck v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 7:10 am
And 67-year-old Clarence Thomas is rumored to be mulling retirement so he can spend more time driving around in his RV with his right-wing activist wife.Sure, I wish Hillary Clinton had not followed Colin Powell's lead and used her private email server as Secretary of State. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 8:08 am
Smith v. [read post]
See(2)(A) You Later: Supreme Court Holds that DOJ Has Broad Dismissal Authority Even After Unsealing
21 Jun 2023, 9:59 am
Polansky v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 7:03 am
The Article concludes in Part V by examining the barriers to citizenship and immigrant integration that are created by the interplay among national citizenship norms, state, and local integration policies, and the norms and dynamics internal to immigrant communities themselves. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:46 pm
FEC, and it upheld the disclosure requirements 8–1 (Thomas dissenting). [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:15 am
” And then there’s New York v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:01 pm
Expense Bd. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:10 am
The Court has released the opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:07 pm
” for yourself: dart-v-craigslist. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm
Justices Scalia and Thomas stated that the question here, as in every case in which neutral state action is said to deny equal protection on account of race, is whether the challenged action reflects a racially discriminatory purpose. [read post]
