Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 10,392
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm
S. 633 (2010) (quoting, for its current relevance, statement in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
See also United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule 28.3(b) (Citation Form; Certification) (Aug. 1, 2011) (“For each legal proposition supported by citations in the argument, counsel must cite to any opposing authority if such authority is binding on this court, e.g., U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm
(The name of the case is Mark v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
The allegations, as discussed in United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:43 pm
Take a look at United States of America ex rel. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
We foresee no obstacle to a State’s dealing effectively with this problem. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:57 am
The CopyKat suspects she will, but to an extent it's virgin territory in the United Kingdom. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:12 am
Prior to Myriad, the US Supreme Court held in Mayo v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am
The 76 Act marked the first statutory reference to fair use. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 4:32 am
Recently, a Portuguese wine company, Wine Vision Lda. sought to register the mark “NOPA” in standard characters for “wines” through the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
– 10:15 a.m.Presented by the Section on Constitutional Law and co-sponsored by the Sections on Women in Legal Education and Legal History, this program marks the 50th anniversary of Griswold v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has just been reportedly faced with a case of alleged nepotism on the part of one of its Commissioners, the outcome being reported by the Washington Times (here, with a katpat to Chris Torrero for the link). [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm
And yet I took the job.And swore the oath set forth in 28 USC § 453.Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the… [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
Can you describe the differences between statutory law systems in the United States and the statutory codes of European states? [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 7:23 am
These cases have all arisen very quickly since the United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:23 am
These cases have all arisen very quickly since the United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm
" (page 11) Of course, the states will appeal this to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Can Member States do so, or is it exclusively an EU prerogative? [read post]
