Search for: "In The Matter Of: D.C"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 9,982
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2016, 12:12 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:36 am
Just this week, in a civil FOIA litigation, D.C. federal court Judge Amit Mehta of the U.S. [read post]
6 May 2021, 11:08 am
Indeed, it’s worth keeping in mind that on Jan. 6, Facebook also banned “calls for protests – even peaceful ones — if they violate the curfew in D.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 8:14 am
Washington, D.C. -- The U.S. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:26 am
Engagement in Central America: Why It Matters and How to Move Forward. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 11:00 am
As a practical matter, the First Amendment issues in those types of operational law analyses generally concern an individual’s or a group’s rights to association and speech. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:19 pm
.'” (Quoting D.C. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:08 am
The Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 5:05 am
Can Trump be impeached and removed quickly enough to matter? [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 1:30 pm
No matter: Eight officers continue detaining the man until the officer develops a second "hunch" that drugs are probably in the house. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:06 pm
This week's stories take us from sea to shining sea, starting first with Mountain View, California and ending up back in Boston via Hawaii and D.C. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:26 am
Although the conservative majority on the Supreme Court has generally favored First Amendment arguments used for deregulatory ends—indeed, when still a judge on the D.C. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 5:59 am
(On Tuesday, the D.C. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:21 pm
So this week EFF is bringing the nerds (aka technologists) to Washington, D.C. to host an informative briefing for Senate staffers. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:46 am
FTC, 407 F.2d 1252, 1256–57 (D.C. [read post]
18 May 2018, 7:41 am
Circuit now understands must be resolved as a matter of statutory interpretation by the courts). [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
The courts ultimately said “no,” see Abigail Alliance v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 5:23 pm
D.C. bans discrimination based on “the state of belonging to or endorsing any political party. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm
StabilityOversight Council, 865 F.3d 661, 665 (D.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:14 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
