Search for: "People v. Grant" Results 5541 - 5560 of 17,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2012, 6:25 pm by Hakemi
With respect to damages, the Court reviewed the law of defamation, including available defences (citing the Supreme Court in Grant v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 12:57 am
SA KINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeIneffective Assistance of Counsel Claim Best Brought In Writ of Error Coram Nobis to Appellate Division People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:33 am
Tuitt WESTCHESTER COUNTY Criminal Practice Motion to Consolidate Two Indictments for Joint Trial Granted; Defendant Fails to Show Prejudice People v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:23 am
It was not possible to grant these requests (i) in light of his earlier non-compliance and (ii) in the absence of evidence that he had, in fact, duly filed evidence in the Registry proceedings. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Also, the plaintiff was granted an injunction preventing the defendants from continuing to publish the imputations complained of. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 4:34 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The new petition and appendix were filed in Pedersen v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Saini J has granted Ms George permission to appeal in respect of a point of law relating to the application and interpretation of section 3(1) Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:29 am by Nelson Tebbe
It is why the line of cases coming out of Sherbert v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 7:59 pm by Kurt R. Karst
By Philip Won & Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert —“Total Product Life Cycle Advisory Program or TAP pilot — the most exciting thing in MDUFA V. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
LTD. v. uCOOL, INC. https://t.co/DyoGX8FYr2 -> Use of photo in blog post is fair use says US CA Katz v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]